Systematic theology has been something I’ve had a love/hate relationship with since seminary. I love all theology because it is about eternal truth. There are three types of theology which I love in this order: Biblical theology, historical theology, and systematic theology.
Biblical theology asks the question, “What does the Bible say?” As straightforwardly as possible it lists what the Scripture says. It does its best not to impose logic, tradition, preference, or the personal into the expression of theology. It prefers Biblical words to non-Biblical words. Historical theology is simply a study of the record of what the church and churches have said about God, church, man, etc., down through the ages. Systematic theology is an attempt to create a structure for theology that does not exist in Scripture and is too much the product of human organization of thought.
I’ve heard people say the Bible is a systematic book, but it is evident that if it were, they wouldn’t have to make that defense. The Bible is a relational book and has some of the loose ends all relationships do, even being an infallible, inerrant book. It demonstrates God’s love for the world through story, law, poetry, gospel, letters, etc., but in no part does it resemble a systematic theology for long. Therefore, it is by design not systematic.
You may be a person who isn’t interested in this and may see it as a preacher argument, but I assure you most of the wrong turns the church has taken have been done in the name of systematic theology. Most of the corrections have been through a return to Biblical theology. This is a caution and an interesting point (I hope) for those of you who are students of our faith.
